Gun Glory (1957)

gunglory1

A gunfighter returns after a long absence to save a town as well as his relationship with his son.

Stewart Granger plays a cowboy who returns to town after a long period away from family. He’s earned himself quite a reputation as a gambler and gunfighter, and once back home finds that his wife has died, and that his son resents him deeply. Granger and son agree to live together and develop the run down property into a real ranch. In town, Granger catches the interest of widow Rhonda Fleming who accepts his offer of a housekeeping job at the ranch. Baddie James Gregory arrives to announce to the townspeople that he plans to run 20,000 cattle through, waving off any mention of legal documents that exist to stop such an act. One of Gregory’s trio (doing his impersonation of Richard Widmark’s Kiss of Death snicker) challenges Granger to a gunfight and loses, which, as in many western plots and law-abiding towns, sets Granger up as a man to be feared, looked down upon, and in this case badly needed. The rest of the story concerns the Gregory gang’s crimes and bullying, including an ambush and final showdown that leads many characters to question their thinking on guns. Those events are woven in with the other story threads of Granger’s efforts to patch things up with his troubled son while developing a romance with Fleming.

gunglory3

This movie was enjoyable, anchored by Granger’s solid, genteel presence. He and Fleming have a nice, very proper and slow-building chemistry. It’s a welcome and comfortable approach for Fleming’s character after the creepy advances of the storekeeper (Jacques Aubuchon) who employed her since the death of her husband. Aubuchon so resents her attraction and defection to Granger, that he explodes in rage when she leaves the store and he spends almost every scene disparaging and denouncing Granger and his gunfighter ways. Chill Wills plays a Preacher, peacemaker and realist who respects Granger and tries to get the townsfolk to accept the reforming gunman, and also has a nice moment singing in church. Arch Johnson plays Gregory’s gun crazy and vengeful right hand who leers at Fleming and is obsessed with killing Granger. The weak link here is the actor playing Granger’s son, Steve Rowland, son of director Roy. Rowland struggles with most of the required emotions, and does best when he storms off and broods.

In his autobiography Sparks Fly Upward, Granger had little praise for the picture, the shooting experience or the title, and stated that producer Nicholas Nayfack, Roy Rowland, and his son Steve all owed their jobs to nepotism. But Granger said he wanted the money and so he went through the training needed to convince audiences he could be a fast gun. He had the tricks down with an empty firearm, but once the camera rolled on the shootout scenes, he suffered burns on his leg and a hand injury. He said he was happy to go back to swashbuckling after those mishaps. It seems his only praise was for the intelligent horse they got him, a gorgeous one named Sundown who has a special scene in the film demonstrating a talent for herding cattle. The movie had another big reward for Granger; he struck up a friendship with the man who supplied the massive herd of cattle needed for the movie, which led to Granger and his wife Jean Simmons buying a new ranch in Arizona. Granger may have written off Gun Glory as a zero, but I found it just fine mainly due to his presence, and overall a smooth, easygoing western with enough plot and charming or interesting actors to hold your interest.

See the comic book adaptation of this movie here

gungloryp

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Gun Glory (1957)”

  1. That’s interesting to hear about Granger’s impressions of the film and his feelings about it in general. I think he was too hard on it to be honest; it’s a goodish solid western and Granger’s own performance was very strong and convincing in my opinion.
    I was also impressed by Fleming and felt she played nicely off Granger, the romance which develops is entirely believable (which isn’t always the case in movies) and a lot of that is down to the two stars.
    I agree too on Steve Rowland – I felt his performance was the weakest thing in the film.

    1. I don’t understand his dislike for the movie, I thought he was great in it, and as you say the romance is very adult, takes its time and feels natural. Also the way she treats his son after his advance for example, she ends up playing a role in his growth as well. There’s a lot going on and it looks good too, I enjoyed it.

  2. As you know, Granger works for me and this was a decent oater. I wouldnt mind catching the interest of a Fleming lookalike! Also want to mention James Gregory as one of those guys I really like in feature player roles. Love that voice of his. He made a great General Ursus in the second Apes film.

    1. Rhonda was a great beauty and strong lead, not a fragile damsel in distress which is always a plus in westerns. Agree about Gregory, he’s intimidating and makes for a good villain.

  3. Great stuff as always Kristina, although it could have been improved by the addition of a couple dozen stills of Rhonda Fleming.

    1. Sounds like a request for a photo gallery! Thanks, good movie, and nice work from Rhonda so a fan like you should check it out.

Comments are closed.